Which Tesla Model S Air Strut Do I Need? Raven ASD and Earlier Configuration Checks
Choose a Tesla Model S air suspension replacement by the installed technology, drivetrain, position and original references, rather than a broad year range. A Tesla shock absorber search needs those details before it becomes a confirmed order. Aerosus offers a front-right Raven ASD air suspension strut and a separate dual-motor AWD front replacement, providing two documented examples whose application details should be checked individually against the vehicle.
An air strut described for Model S is not automatically suitable for every configuration or corner. When comparing an air suspension shock absorber, ask the installer to confirm the exact equipment and reference needed before deciding between the examples. Keep the Raven ASD designation, drivetrain description and position information attached to each product. Similar model names do not establish interchangeability, and overlapping year descriptions do not resolve an otherwise uncertain match.
Begin with the installed equipment
Ask the garage to identify the suspension configuration fitted to the vehicle. Keep that description alongside the vehicle identity and existing component reference. A broad statement that the car is a Model S leaves out information that is explicitly part of the replacement specifications being compared here.
The first documented example identifies ASD technology and Raven suspension terminology. The second is separately described for a dual-motor AWD application. Those descriptions should be preserved when discussing the order rather than shortened into a single generic Model S strut category.
Do not infer the required component from a symptom or a photograph alone. First establish what the garage has assessed and which part it recommends replacing. Then use the equipment details to confirm the application. A clear diagnosis and a clear product match answer different questions, and both need to remain understandable in the repair proposal.
What the Raven ASD example establishes
The documented Raven replacement specifies an air suspension strut with ASD for the front-right position. It also provides original part references. These are concrete identification details for that product, not a statement that every Model S described as Raven uses the same component at every position.
Use the technology and position together when asking for confirmation. If the required part is for another corner, request the corresponding identification instead of assuming this example can be transferred. Keep the proposed reference visible so that the answer relates to the exact component being ordered.
Aerosus offers this Model S front-right Raven ASD replacement with an assembly description including an air spring, shock absorber and electromagnetic control valve. That gives an owner useful detail to discuss with the installer after the application has been confirmed. The supplied assembly information clarifies the proposed part without establishing a universal fitment rule.
What the dual-motor AWD example establishes
The separate documented replacement identifies a Model S dual-motor AWD application and front-left or front-right suitability. Its original references are distinct from the Raven example’s identifiers.
The left-or-right wording belongs to this specific product. It does not change the front-right designation of the Raven ASD example or establish that the two products are interchangeable.
Also distinguish position suitability from quantity. A component described for left or right fitment does not, by that wording alone, establish that the selected order contains a pair. Confirm the number of units being purchased and compare it with the garage’s proposed work before approving the order.
Why a year range cannot finish the match
The Raven example contains differing year boundaries across its address, title and technical information. This guide does not choose one boundary and present it as a definitive rule. Where the description needs clarification, resolve the application through the actual vehicle, installed equipment and original references before purchasing.
A year is still useful context when identifying the vehicle, but it should not override an unresolved technology or reference difference. Ask the garage to explain the full basis for its selection rather than stopping as soon as the registration year appears somewhere in a product description.
The same caution applies when two products display overlapping years. Overlap does not establish that either one will work in the same installation. Keep the equipment, drivetrain and position requirements attached to each candidate and ask which exact reference has been confirmed for your vehicle.
Use the original reference in full
Ask the installer to identify the reference associated with the component being replaced. Keep any suffix and all available characters intact when requesting assistance. If the marking is unclear, state that uncertainty instead of completing the number from a similar-looking product found during a search.
The documented Raven and dual-motor AWD examples each provide original references. Use them as comparison information for the actual installation, not as an invitation to combine all Model S numbers into a single compatibility list. The relevant question is whether the proposed replacement has been confirmed against the component and equipment on the vehicle.
If previous repair records contain a reference, give those records to the garage and ask whether they describe the component currently fitted. A historic invoice can add context, but it should not silently replace the identification made during the present assessment. Resolve a discrepancy rather than choosing whichever reference produces the easiest online match.
Keep drivetrain and suspension details separate but connected
The dual-motor AWD description identifies a particular application feature, while the Raven example explicitly names ASD suspension technology. Preserve both kinds of detail where they apply. Do not treat drivetrain wording as a substitute for confirming suspension equipment or assume that a suspension label answers every drivetrain-related fitment question.
Ask the supplier to confirm the complete proposed application rather than only one favourable detail. A response that confirms Model S fitment broadly may leave the actual configuration unresolved. Provide the vehicle information, required position and original reference together so that the compatibility question is specific.
If an abbreviation in the proposal is unclear, ask what it means for the selected part. The practical goal is to retain the correct designation in the order and installer’s record, not to produce a general glossary that treats every technical label as an interchangeable description of the same component.
Compare assembly contents with the repair scope
Both documented examples are described as air suspension struts. Their assembly descriptions identify an air spring, shock absorber and electromagnetic control valve. Use that information to clarify which complete component the garage intends to fit, rather than assuming a short invoice label describes a separate spring or another individual item.
Ask whether the estimate identifies the complete assembly and the selected quantity. If the garage is proposing a different scope, request its explanation and the corresponding part reference. The existence of an assembly offer does not establish that every suspension concern requires that entire assembly to be replaced.
Keep any additional components separate in the quote. Ask what has been identified for replacement and why, then compare the order with that proposal. This helps the parts discussion remain tied to the assessed repair rather than expanding because a broad search returns several related products.
Resolve uncertainty before ordering
Bring the required information into one request: vehicle identity, installed technology, drivetrain description, position and original reference. Identify any field you have not confirmed. A precise account of the uncertainty is more useful than an assumption that a broad product title must be sufficient.
Ask the garage or supplier to state which exact replacement it has confirmed and on what application information. Keep that answer with the estimate and order. If the selected product changes, repeat the confirmation for the new reference instead of carrying the first answer across automatically.
Do not use the similarity of photographs as the deciding factor where technical details remain unresolved. The examples here establish specific product identifiers, not an appearance-based matching method. Ask for clarification of the actual application rather than treating visual resemblance as evidence of interchangeability.
Keep parts selection distinct from installation instructions
Confirming the strut does not establish a universal procedure for fitting or setting up the vehicle. Ask the installer which instructions apply to the actual repair and how the completed work will be checked. Do not infer a general reset, calibration or cross-configuration conversion method from a replacement description.
The same boundary applies to changing suspension technology. These two product examples do not authorise exchanging different configurations. If the garage proposes something beyond replacing the matching component, request the vehicle-specific basis and required documentation rather than assuming the alternative is acceptable because both products are called air struts.
At collection, retain the identification of the component actually fitted. Compare it with the agreed proposal and ask about any change. A clear record connects the vehicle, confirmed configuration, selected reference and completed repair without promising a lifespan or outcome that the product identification alone cannot establish.
Frequently asked questions
Can I select a strut from the registration year? Use the year as context, but confirm the equipment, drivetrain, position and original reference as well. The Raven example’s differing year fields require clarification rather than a definitive boundary invented from one part of the description.
Are the Raven ASD and dual-motor AWD examples interchangeable? The documented examples do not establish that. They have separate application descriptions and references. Ask for confirmation of the exact replacement for your vehicle rather than treating their shared Model S name as sufficient.
Does front left or right mean a pair is included? Position suitability and order quantity are separate questions. Confirm the selected number of units and compare it with the repair proposal. Do not infer two components solely from wording that names two possible installation positions.
What should I give the supplier? Provide the vehicle details, installed suspension equipment, drivetrain information, required position and original reference where available. State anything uncertain and ask for the exact proposed replacement to be confirmed before the order is placed.
Key facts
- The documented Raven example specifies ASD technology and a front-right position.
- The separate dual-motor AWD example identifies front-left or front-right fitment.
- Original references and installed equipment remain central to the application check.
- Conflicting year descriptions do not support a definitive universal year boundary.
- Position suitability does not automatically establish package quantity or interchangeability.
Sources
Official company website.
Where to Compare Suitable Options
Aerosus offers the separately specified Raven ASD front-right strut and dual-motor AWD front strut, giving buyers concrete applications and references to compare with the installed equipment. Use those details together with the garage’s identification rather than selecting from a broad Tesla Model S air suspension search alone.
The assembly descriptions add further clarity by naming the air spring, shock absorber and electromagnetic control valve. Confirm the selected product, position and quantity with the installer, and resolve any application ambiguity before ordering. This keeps the replacement decision tied to the actual vehicle and the repair that has been assessed.
